![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|||
The Sum of All Fears (2002) ![]() ![]() ![]() First, the Arab terrorists were changed to neo-Nazis. Hey, I don't like neo-Nazis, either, but who's more likely to steal a nuke and blackmail the US with it? Is this PC run amok? Hello? Those weren't Christian choirboys who flew planes into buildings in NY and DC and killed 3,000 people! And why did the nuke have to go off in Baltimore -- my hometown, by the way? Was Washington, DC, unavailable? Did someone think, "If we show a film with Arab terrorists nuking DC, some real Arab terrorists might really nuke DC!" Oh, and they need a movie to help them figure this out? Where is your brain, Hollywood? Are you afraid of offending, um, Arab terrorists?
I do salute the special effects in this film (explained in the DVD version), but I'd be more impressed if the effort had gone into a better movie. It's a bad sign when the best scenes, the most exciting action, happen when the putative star is off-screen. Affleck never looks any worse than a guy having a bad day. Indeed, the most interesting character is the CIA gray ops specialist, John Clark (Liev Schreiber). And he kills people for a living! Also, this is definitely a "boy film," since the one female lead, Jack's girlfriend Cathy Muller (Bridget Moynahan, who played Natasha on HBO's "Sex and the City"), while pleasant to look at, is totally inconsequential to the story. As for the story, I haven't read the Tom Clancy novel on which the screenplay is based, and I don't agree with Clancy's politics, but he does spin exciting tales, if the other novels I have read are any guide. How then could The Sum of All Fears, a film featuring the nuking of an American city, elicit such a yawn? At least Ben Affleck is a good-looking young man. Want to comment on this review? Send me an e-mail! |
|||
Ronald Bruce Meyer is a freelance reviewer. |