|
December 8 Pius IX and the Syllabus of Errors (1864) It was on this date, December 8, 1864, that Pope Pius IX published the encyclical Quanta cura, containing the Syllabus errorum or Syllabus of Errors. The Pope "reprobated. proscribed, and condemned" eighty propositions concerning various kinds of religious Liberalism that had been creeping into his Church, a body he believed had stopped innovating with Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century. The Catholic Encyclopedia describes the Syllabus as "an inestimable service to the Church and to society at large." It was in fact a repudiation of the popular demand for freedom of inquiry and freedom of conscience. The following ideas are condemned, but sound quite reasonable as stated: 3. Human reason, without any reference whatsoever to God, is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood...What Pius IX condemned generally as "Liberalism" is today seen as general principles of modern civilization. The Syllabus, still in force today, is Roman medievalism gasping for air. Want to comment on this essay? Send me an e-mail! |
||
|
Pius IX and Original Sin (1854)
It was also on this date, December 8, 1854 that the same Pope Pius IX promulgated, in the bull Ineffabilis Deus, the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception. Not to be confused with the "virgin birth" legend of Jesus, this equally absurd doctrine says that, at Mary's conception, she did not inherit the guilt of the sin of Adam known as Original Sin. Articulated in the Genesis legend of the Fall of Man, all humans inherited God's curse on Adam, the Original Sin. This can be relieved only through Christian baptism. The ideas of inherited sin and eternal punishment would seem to make the Christian religion an inferior creed to the many circulating in the Greek-Roman world in the beginning centuries of the Christian Era. Most other religious systems, not to mention legal systems, would never prescribe infinite punishment for finite offenses. Similarly, to maintain that guilt is carried from father to son, generation upon generation, is absurd on its face. > The idea was controversial for the early Church, but Tertullian in the 2nd century, and Augustine in the 5th century, made it doctrine. Original Sin made medieval reformers queasy, as we see in Martin Luther's Thirty-nine Articles. Most modern theologians either ignore Original Sin or evade it, when they do not actually condemn it. But it is why Catholic babies are rushed to church for baptism as soon as possible after birth. To everyone else, the idea is a joke: "Do you believe in Original Sin?" "I don't know. How original do you want to be?" Want to comment on this essay? Send me an e-mail! |
||
Wordcount 622 | |